Cases 51 - 60 of 120
Scott et al v. UZ Trans, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv02061
Plaintiff:
Gregory E. Scott and Robin L. Scott
Defendant:
UZ Trans, Inc., Gankhuyag Khurelbat, ALTL, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott et al v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Dorothy L. Scott and Jerry Grove
Defendant:
The United States of America and Transportation Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Scott et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11703
Plaintiff:
Rebecca L. Scott and Gerald T. Scott
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2015cv05541
Plaintiff:
REBECCA L. SCOTT and GERALD T. SCOTT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv03742
Plaintiff:
Kay L. Scott
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01258
Plaintiff:
KAY L. SCOTT
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv02217
Plaintiff:
Shelley L. Scott
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. CAESAR'S ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION et al
as 1:2014cv07912
Plaintiff:
YAROJIN S. ROBINSON
Defendant:
CAESAR'S ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, CAESAR'S ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING COMPANY, HARRAH'S ATLANTIC CITY RESORT AND CASINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Massey et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2014cv13585
Plaintiff:
Virginia G Massey and Floyd Massey
Defendant:
Jerold L Scott and Dillon 1, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv23259
Plaintiff:
Catherine L. Scott
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
