Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Edwards et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01224
Plaintiff:
Paige Michelle Edwards and James Andrew Edwards
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mace v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Mace
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mace v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2018oe00320
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Mace
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrews et al v. Shulkin et al
as 1:2018cv01533
Plaintiff:
Bertha Andrews , Denorris Andrews and James Andrews
Defendant:
David J. Shulkin, John Nathan Deal and Karen C. Gainey ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Smith, et al v. James Andrew Harris, III, et al
as 2:2016cv16497
Plaintiff:
Ewell T. Smith and William M. Villarrubia
Defendant:
James Andrew Harris, III and Farmers Insurance Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrews et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03172
Plaintiff:
James Andrews and Yana Andrews
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. Frechter
as 4:2015cv10132
Plaintiff:
James Crawford
Defendant:
James Andrew Frechter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. Frechter
as 9:2015cv81046
Plaintiff:
James Crawford
Defendant:
James Andrew Frechter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mace v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02291
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Mace
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mace v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv06128
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Mace
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
