Cases 71 - 80 of 1,324
Ahmadzada et al v. Progressive Corporation
as 1:2023cv01536
Plaintiff:
Aydin Ahmadzada, Tarlan Ahmadov and Ramilya Ismayilova
Defendant:
Progressive Corporation, aka Progressive Direct Insurance Company, an Ohio corporation, Progressive Corporation and Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lattimore v. Bennett et al
as 1:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Venita A. Lattimore
Defendant:
Kelly A. Bennett, Secretary of the Department of Human Services Administrator of The Medicare Coordination of Benefits and Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
Cross Defendant:
Sean Rugless
Cross Claimant:
Ohio Department of Job and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Garry Edwards et al v. Scott David Leonard et al
as 2:2023cv04437
Plaintiff:
Gary Edwards, Gary Edwards as Successor in Interest on behalf of Nathan Edwards, Deirdre Edwards and others
Cross Claimant:
Scott David Leonard and Gias Life Fund LLC
Defendant:
Gias Life Fund, LLC, Farshad Rabbani, Time Zone Entertainment Properties, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland/Zurich and Ohio Security Insurance Company/Liberty Mutual Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Smith et al v. American Red Cross of East Central Ohio
as 2:2023cv01867
Plaintiff:
David E. Smith and Sigrid Smith
Defendant:
American Red Cross of East Central Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Tecca v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Tecca
Defendant:
Fred Meyer Stores Inc and The Kroger Co an Ohio corporation, registered and doing business in Washington doing business as Fred Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
County of Cuyahoga v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2017op45004
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., CVS Pharmacy Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, Michael C. O'Malley and Cuyahoga County of Ohio
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co., HBC Service Company and Rite Aid of Ohio, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
John and Jane Does
Interested Party:
State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bennett v. Tractor Supply Company et al
as 2:2023cv01501
Plaintiff:
Aaron J. Bennett
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Company and Ohio Department of Medicaid
Cross Defendant:
Coleman Powersports
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gorton et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv01110
Defendant:
Borgwarner Morse TEC, General Refractories Company, Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross Defendant:
American Refractories, Pfizer, Inc., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC, Honeywell International, Inc., Bayer Cropscience, LP and others
Amicus Curiae:
Rhonda J. Gorton
Special Master:
Judge Russell M. Nigro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Estate of Trina L. Cunningham v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
as 23-1467
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF TRINA L. CUNNINGHAM, Personal Representative Towanda Grant-Cunningham, TOWANDA GRANT-CUNNINGHAM, FAITH CUNNINGHAM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, BALTIMORE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, RUDY CHOW, Director, Individually and in official capacity and others
Dwan Bray, et al v. Bon Secours Mercy Health, Inc., et al
as 23-3357
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAWN BRAY, Individually and as Parent, Natural Guardian, and Next Friend on behalf of N. B., AARON BRAY, Individually and as Parent, Natural Guardian, and Next Friend on behalf of N. B. and DWAN BRAY, Individually and as Parent, Natural Guardian, and Next Friend on behalf of N. B.
Defendant / Appellee:
BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH, INC., MERCY HEALTH - ANDERSON HOSPITAL LLC, BROWN COUNTY WOMEN'S HEALTH, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
