Cases 81 - 90 of 1,017
Rossiter v. Stanely Black & Decker Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01115
Plaintiff:
Steven Rossiter
Defendant:
Stanely Black & Decker Inc and Sears Roebuck & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lupian v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 4:2017cv01917
Plaintiff:
Blanca Lupian
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyra Kirksey v. Schindler Elevator Corporation, et al
as 17-11420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRA KIRKSEY, as mother, next friend, and legal heir of Jakob Kirksey, a deceased minor
Defendant - Appellee:
SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION and SEARS ROEBUCK & CO.
:
SERVICE
Mariana Lemos v. Sears, Roebuck and Co et al
as 5:2017cv00598
Defendant:
Does, Samsung, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mariana Lemos
Movant:
Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc.
Jones v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
as 2:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jacob N. Jones
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co. and Sears Tech ID 07822177
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corning v. MTD Products Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Kevin Corning
Defendant:
MTD Products, Inc and Sears, Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard McCuistian v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al
as 17-10388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD WARREN MCCUISTIAN, as Administrator for the Estate of Anne McCuistian, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., a corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., a corporation
Mercury Casualty Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
Mercury Casualty Company
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co. and Whirlpool Corporation
PATSILEVAS v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY
as 2:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
PETER J. PATSILEVAS
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 4:2016cv00766
Plaintiff:
Rhoda Adams
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
