Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Thomas v. Dermoviva Skin Essentials, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv08696
Defendant:
Luster Products, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Dermoviva Skin Essentials, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
John Doe v. Cook et al
as 1:2023cv10362
Defendant:
Aziz Beladel, Jay, Lindsay Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Adnane Touzami and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03122
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thomas
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Bennett et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al.
as 1:2019cv02126
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hepler, Carletta Williams, Linda Bates and others
Defendant:
Does 1-50, Inclusive and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blackford et al v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv03825
Plaintiff:
John W. Blackford , Maxine Blackford , Sandra Rand and others
Defendant:
Wyeth Pharmaceutical, Inc. , Sandoz, Inc. , Eon Labs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv03070
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thomas
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Stryker Corporation
as 4:2015cv04968
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thomas
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14961
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thomas
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv11114
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thomas
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04579
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN THOMAS
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
