Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Boring v. Commissioner Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Dale Boring
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration, United States Social Security Administration, Gail Ennis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Fogarty et al v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv02163
Plaintiff:
Michael L Fogarty, April MC Gomez and Victor J Gomez
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration, City of Mesquite/ Fire Dept, Mesquite EMT's and others
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Butler v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv02438
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth M. Butler
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Canales-Cancel v. Biden, et al
as 22-1437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE L. CANALES-CANCEL and JOSE LUIS CANALES-CANCEL, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., WHITE HOUSE, US GOVERNMENT and others
Jeffrey Ruschak v. Stuart Tauberg, et al
as 17-2996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY A. RUSCHAK
Defendant - Appellee:
STUART G. TAUBERG, Doctor - Cardiologist, GERALD MYERS, Doctor - Cardiologist, COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY, Office of General Counsel and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TRANOVICH, Doctor - Orthopedic Surgeon
Ellen E. Packenham Stanley v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 17-2255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ellen E. Packenham Stanley
Plaintiff:
Ellen E. Packenham Stanley, as Representative Payee for M.J.S.
Defendant - Appellee:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Larry Davis, Sr. v. Commissioner, Social Security, et al
as 16-11799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY D. DAVIS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KIM BROACH, Field Office Director for Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
