Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ADKINS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03151
Plaintiff:
LONNIE FOSS, CHRISTOPHER HENSON, WILBERT IVORY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adkins et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02122
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Foss, Christopher Henson, Wilbert Ivory and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
HARRIS v. USA
as 1:2016cv00560
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHASE HARRIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Eugene Chew, Jr., et al v. American Greetings Corporation
as 13-1966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Chew, Jr., Daniel Chase Hoskins, Consolidated Plaintiff 3:11-cv-00124-BSM and Whitney Dale Hoskins, Consolidated Plaintiff 3:11-cv-00124-BSM
Plaintiff:
David Mark Duncan, Consolidated Plaintiff in 3:10-cv-00214-BSM and Nancy Duncan, Consolidated Plaintiff 3:10-cv-00214-BSM, wife of David Mark Duncan
Defendant - Appellee:
American Greetings Corporation
David Duncan, et al v. American Greetings Corporation
as 13-1751
Plaintiff:
Eugene Chew, Jr., Daniel Chase Hoskins, Consolidated Plaintiff 3:11-cv-00124-BSM and Whitney Dale Hoskins, Consolidated Plaintiff 3:11-cv-00124-BSM
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Mark Duncan, Consolidated Plaintiff in 3:10-cv-00214-BSM and Nancy Duncan, Consolidated Plaintiff 3:10-cv-00214-BSM, wife of David Mark Duncan
Defendant - Appellee:
American Greetings Corporation
Hoskins et al v. American Greetings Corporation
as 3:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
Daniel Chase Hoskins and Whitney Dale Hoskins
Defendant:
American Greetings Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dyess v. Conagra Foods Inc
as 1:2008cv01298
Plaintiff:
Daniel Chase Dyess
Defendant:
Conagra Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dyess v. Conagra Foods Inc
as 1:2008cv00209
Plaintiff:
Daniel Chase Dyess
Defendant:
Conagra Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
