Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hutchinson et al v. The United States et al
as 1:2023cv03715
Plaintiff:
George Baldwin Hutchinson, Jr. and G. Baldwin: House of Hutchinson:man
Defendant:
The United States, People in Key Roles of Offices of Director and Chief Counsel of Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Audrey Y. Davis and others
Tony Jordan v. Defense Finance and Accounting, et al
as 17-14456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY A. JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICES, an agency of U.S. Department of Defense, DEFENSE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS, an agency under U.S. Department of Defense and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Boddie v. Defense Finance and Accounting Service
as 3:2016cv01685
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Boddie
Defendant:
Defense Finance and Accounting Service
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jordan v. Defense Finance and Accounting Services et al
as 8:2015cv00391
Plaintiff:
Tony A. Jordan
Defendant:
Defense Finance and Accounting Services, Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Christopher Philip Langan v. Defense Finance & Accounting Service, et al
as 3:2014cv02563
Plaintiff:
Christopher Philip Langan
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Dolce v. Defense Finance and Accounting Service
as 1:2012cv01510
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Dolce
Defendant:
Defense Finance and Accounting Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
HARDY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE
as 1:2009cv00144
Plaintiff:
PRESTON HARDY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
