Cases 1 - 10 of 132
McNeil v. Grooms et al
as 2:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
Eurika McNeil
Defendant:
Officer Jacob Grooms, City of Goose Creek Police Department and City of Goose Creek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Breech et al v. Ergon Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Deborah Breech and Audrey E. Grooms
Defendant:
Ergon Trucking, Inc. and Bruce Randall Stack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Groom v. Seehusen et al
as 2:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Groom
Defendant:
Steven Seehusen and Sarah Seehusen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kelty v. Walla Walla County et al
as 4:2023cv05145
Plaintiff:
Ryan Kelty
Defendant:
Walla Walla County, Rebecca Groom, John Liger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GROOMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13722
Plaintiff:
RICKY DARRELL GROOMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GROOMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04660
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GROOMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GROOM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16126
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER GROOM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GROOMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09024
Plaintiff:
ERIC GROOMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WAGNER v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07508
Plaintiff:
JAMES WAGNER, JOHNATHAN WAGNER, BOYD A. WALKER, JR. and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wagner et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
James Wagner, Johnathan Wagner, Boyd A. Walker, Jr. and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
