Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bailey-Lynch v. JcPenny Hair Salon et al
as 1:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Bailey-Lynch
Defendant:
JcPenny Hair Salon, Shaniqua and Ken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORRIS v. JOHN PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS
as 2:2021cv02564
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MORRIS
Defendant:
JOHN PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS
3Rd Party Defendant:
BEAUTIFUL NATURALLY! HAIR SALON, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sauerbrei v. Regis Corporation, et al
as 6:2021cv03045
Defendant:
Regis Corporation doing business as Smart Style Hair Salons
Plaintiff:
Linsey Sauerbrei
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Regis Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00558
Defendant:
Regis Corporation doing business as SmartStyle Hair Salons by Regis and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lewis Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
G.B. v. JADE NAILS HAIR SPA et al
as 5:2019cv06093
Defendant:
JADE NAILS HAIR SPA, JOHN AND JANE DOES (A-Z), ALLEN NHIN and others
Plaintiff:
G.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. Style America Hair Salon et al
as 1:2018cv00317
Plaintiff:
Judith Griffith
Defendant:
Style America Hair Salon and Regis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Santos et al v. SHEKNAH HAIR SALON et al
as 1:2016cv10604
Plaintiff:
Telma Santos and FERNANDA ANTIONIO
Defendant:
SHEKNAH HAIR SALON, CLEIBSTER CABRAL, CAROL HAIR DESIGN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santos v. Sheknah Hair Salon et al
as 1:2016cv10605
Plaintiff:
Telma Santos
Defendant:
Sheknah Hair Salon, Cleibster Cabral, Carol Hair Design and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sabedra v. Regis Corporation, et al
as 6:2014cv00016
Defendant:
Regis Corporation and The Person or Entity Doing Business as TGF Hair Salon
Plaintiff:
Hannah Sabedra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akanuma v. Akanuma et al
as 1:2011cv03326
Plaintiff:
Gianna Akanuma
Defendant:
Mitsuru Akanuma, Toshi Suzuki, Toshi and hair mates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
