Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jones v. Monzon
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Jones
Defendant:
Matthew Monzon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05662
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY ANN JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GEE et al v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
as 4:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GEE, Barry Williams, DEWEY GOOLSBY and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GEE et al v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
as 1:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GEE, BARRY WILLIAMS, DEWEY GOOLSBY and others
Defendant:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42960
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY HARPER JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv08312
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv63184
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Guffey
as 2:2019cv01040
Defendant:
JHT Holdings/Unimark LLC, Ronald Hugh Guffey and Unimark Lowboy Transportation LLC
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Catrice Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. Laclede Chain Manufacturing Company, LLC
as 5:2019cv00223
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Jones and Donald R. Jones, II
Defendant:
Laclede Chain Manufacturing Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clarke-Jones v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00733
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Clarke-Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
