Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23942
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T MCDONALD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McDonald v. The United States of America
as 7:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Michael F. McDonald
Defendant:
The United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
McDonald v. Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00139
Defendant:
Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc., Simonton Windows, Inc. and Urban Machinery Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael W. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19998
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv45180
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Central Boat Rentals Inc
as 6:2015cv02073
Plaintiff:
Michael R McDonald
Defendant:
Central Boat Rentals Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Michael McDonald v. Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board
as 2:2015cv04817
Plaintiff:
Michael S. McDonald
Defendant:
Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board
McDonald v. De Puy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2011dp22811
Plaintiff:
Michael J. McDonald
Defendant:
De Puy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. De Puy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 5:2011cv05083
Plaintiff:
Michael J. McDonald
Defendant:
De Puy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
McDonald et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20530
Plaintiff:
Michael L. McDonald and Brandi L. McDonald
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
