Cases 1 - 10 of 16
WOLFE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02471
Plaintiff:
MARY WOLFE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wolfe et al v. Kaufman Realty & Auctions of West Virginia, LLC
as 1:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
Mary Wolfe and Robert Wolfe
Defendant:
Kaufman Realty & Auctions of West Virginia, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WOLFE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv08731
Plaintiff:
MARY WOLFE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04123
Plaintiff:
Susanne A. Terrill, Shirley Desalvo, Penny Hustead and others
Defendant:
Astora Women's Health Holdings, LLC, Boston Scientific Corporation, Doe Manufacturers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01251
Plaintiff:
Amy Jones , Sandra Agrella , Kim Lovell and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, LLC , Astora Women's Health LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolfe v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00584
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Wolfe
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolfe v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01255
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Wolfe
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hurley v. Callies et al
as 0:2014cv01525
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jerome Hurley
Defendant:
Corey Mark Callies and Ali Marie Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
hurley v. callies et al
as 0:2014cv01497
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jerome hurley
Defendant:
corey Mark callies and Ali Marie wolf
hurley v. callies et al
as 0:2014cv01498
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jerome hurley
Defendant:
corey Mark callies and Ali Marie wolf
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
