Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MURPHY, JR. v. ESSILORLUXOTTICA USA INC. et al
as 4:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
HARVEY EUGENE MURPHY, JR.
Defendant:
ESSILORLUXOTTICA USA INC., LUXOTTICA OF AMERICA INC., LUXOTTICA RETAIL NORTH AMERICA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Pfleger v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04970
Plaintiff:
Eric Pfleger
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pfleger et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28289
Plaintiff:
Karen Pfleger and Hans-Peter Pfleger
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spears, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6291
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KATHY JOHNSON, MELISA JOHNSON, NANCY KNIBB and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Pfleger et al v. Bickham et al
as 3:2013cv01114
Plaintiff:
Guy M. Pfleger and Louann Pfleger
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Alabama Trucking Association Workers' Compensation Self Insurance Fund
Defendant:
Alicia Bickham and Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spears et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00846
Plaintiff:
Valerie Spears , Manorama Mahajan , Kathy Johnson and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
PFLEGER et al v. J.C. PENNEY, CORP. et al
as 3:2007cv01059
Plaintiff:
NORAH N. PFLEGER and DONALD A. PFLEGER
Defendant:
J.C. PENNEY, CORP., J.C. PENNEY, CORP., OCEAN COUNTY MALL and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
J.C. PENNEY, CORP. and J.C. PENNEY, CORP.
ThirdParty Defendant:
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.
Cross Claimant:
OCEAN COUNTY MALL, OCEAN COUNTY MALL and SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.
Cross Defendant:
XYZ COMPANIES, 1-5, ABC MAINTENANCE COMPANIES, 1-5, J.C. PENNEY, CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
