Cases 1 - 10 of 8,801
ZUPPO v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al.
as 4:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ZUPPO
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Richards v. The Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2024cv03630
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Richards
Defendant:
The Long Island Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
HOUCK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
MARK HOUCK and RYAN-MARIE HOUCK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL ROGERS, JUAN BARRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Ross v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2024cv03581
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ross
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Stephens v. Walmart, Inc
as 1:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Jennifer N. Stephens
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Perkins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02447
Plaintiff:
Stephen Perkins
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Druhan v. Hoge et al
as 1:2024cv11309
Plaintiff:
Robert Druhan
Defendant:
Stephen Hoge, Noubar Afeyan and Stephane Bancel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Tyler v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02439
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lee Tyler
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Steele v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65543
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Steele, II
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02297
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
