Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NELSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv20199
Plaintiff:
SUSAN NELSON and THE ESTATE OF MARIAN GRIFFITHS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06103
Plaintiff:
Susan Nelson
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sandoz, Inc., Accord Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2017cv05362
Plaintiff:
Susan Nelson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. RIVR Media et al
as 2:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Susan Nelson
Defendant:
RIVR Media and A&E Networks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv17461
Plaintiff:
Susan Nelson and John Nelson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17460
Plaintiff:
Susan Nelson and John Nelson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Fosamax
as 14-2400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUSAN NELSON and JAMES NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC
Nelson et al v. Worldwide Equipment Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv07809
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Nelson and Susan Nelson
Defendant:
Worldwide Equipment, Inc. , Ace Truck Body Equipment, Inc. , Certified Power, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NELSON et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2012cv02258
Plaintiff:
SUSAN NELSON and JAMES NELSON
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
