Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gordon et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00399
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eliot Gordon, Keith Eugene Mokher, Christopher Mongillo and others
Petitioner:
Lawrence Pierson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Gordon et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01717
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eliot Gordon, Keith Eugene Mokher, Christopher Mongillo and others
Petitioner:
Lawrence Pierson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MURRAY III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51628
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOSEPH MURRAY III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2019cv23939
Plaintiff:
Thomas Terrence Murray
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hickman v. Murray, et al
as 2:2019cv11711
Not Yet Classified:
Uber Technologies Inc., ABC Insurance Company and Progressive Ins Co
Defendant:
Thomas J Murray, Jr., Rasier, LLC, Progressive Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Hickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas A. Murray v. Accomack County Health Dept
as 14-1134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS A. MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
ACCOMACK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Director
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Murray v. Accomac County Health Department et al
as 2:2013cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Murray
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Medical Malpractice
COOMBS et al v. MURRAY
as 2:2007cv04449
Plaintiff:
EILEEN MAHONEY COOMBS and DOUGLAS J. COOMBS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
