Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LOVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv02960
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CURTIS LOVE, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CURTIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84733
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CURTIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois et al
as 1:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Thomas Curtis and Janice Curtis
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois, Safeco General Agency, Inc., Safeco Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv01059
Plaintiff:
Thomas Curtis
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kimberly Curtis, et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC
as 13-11191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIMBERLY CURTIS and THOMAS CURTIS, Husband and Wife
Defendant - Appellee:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Curtis et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv06238
Plaintiff:
Julianna M. Curtis and Thomas Curtis
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curtis v. Mentor Worldwide
as 4:2011cv05074
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Curtis and Thomas Curtis
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis v. Mentor Worldwide
as 1:2011cv07031
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Curtis and Thomas Curtis
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2006cv10637
Plaintiff:
Patricia S. Curtis and Thomas Curtis
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
