Cases 41 - 50 of 436
GYROOR USIn re: GYROOR US
as 22-155
Petitioner:
In re: GYROOR US, URBANMAX, GAODESHANGUS and others
Respondent:
ABC CORPORATION I, ABC CORPORATION II and EBAY, INC.
Lexos Media IP, LLC v. eBay, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
Lexos Media IP, LLC
Defendant:
eBay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Warren v. Ebay, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03524
Defendant:
Oldboombox, Ebay, Inc., Jamie Lannone and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Warren
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (a) False representation of goods sold in interstate commerce
Luoma Enterprises of Duluth, Inc v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
Luoma Enterprises and Luoma Enterprises of Duluth, Inc
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Tractor Supply Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Crawford v. Ebay, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01128
Plaintiff:
Matthew Crawford
Defendant:
Ebay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Warnstedt v. DNA Specialty Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Andrew H. Warnstedt
Defendant:
DNA Specialty Inc., Ebay Inc. and FedEx Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Alexander Gifford v. eBay, Inc.
as 22-1086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER ROY GIFFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
EBAY, INC.
Ryan Tieszen v. LG Chem Ltd.
as 22-8003
Respondent:
Ryan Tieszen
Defendant:
eBay, Inc., Vapah, Inc. and First Doe through Thirtieth Doe
Petitioner:
LG Chem Ltd.
Ryan Tieszen v. LG Chem Ltd.
as 22-1110
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ryan Tieszen
Defendant:
eBay, Inc., Vapah, Inc. and First Doe through Thirtieth Doe
Defendant / Appellant:
LG Chem Ltd.
Phillips et al v. Swagaway, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Shneur Zalman Phillips
Defendant:
Swagaway, LLC, Zake IP Holdings, LLC, Hoverzon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
