Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jerome Brown, Sr. v. Ivan Davis
as 22-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN D. DAVIS, Magistrate Judge, RICHARD D. FAIRBANK, President CEO Headquarters and DEENA L. REYNOLDS, In-House Landlord Tenant Counsel
Brown v. Davis et al
as 1:2022cv00926
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
Ivan D. Davis, Richard D. Fairbank and Deena L. Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Addison et al v. Transamerica Retirement Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00204
Defendant:
Transamerica Retirement Solutions LLC, Diversified Retirement Corporation, KPMG LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Tamera A. Carter, Sheila Bishop, Alfreda R. Browne and others
Counter Defendant:
Bert Chapman, Yolanda B. Bradley, Jacqueline I. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
DAVIS v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 1:2021cv10621
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY D. DAVIS
Defendant:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
OWB REO LLC v. Jacqualine D. Davis et al
as 2:2015cv04810
Defendant:
Jacqualine D. Davis, Does and Paul Martin
Plaintiff:
OWB REO LLC
Michael Davis v. Samuel I. White, P.C.
as 14-1472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C., ERIC WHITE, RONALD JAMES GUILLOT, JR. and others
Davis vs JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
as 1:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Monte'y D. Davis
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Howard Beirman and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Samuel I. White, PC et al
as 3:2013cv00780
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Davis
Defendant:
Samuel I. White, PC, Eric White, Ronald J. Guillot, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Schafler v. Judge Newsome, et al.,
as 3:2011cv03175
Petitioner:
Pepi Schafler
Defendant:
Newsome, Richard J. Spear and Dennis D. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
