Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Anthony Mattera, et al v. Robert Baffert, et al
as 23-5750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY MATTERA, BRAD KENT, WILLIAM ADAMS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT A. BAFFERT, BOB BAFFERT RACING, INC. and CHURCHILL DOWNS, INC.
Mattera et al v. Baffert et al
as 3:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mattera, Brad Kent, William Adams and others
Defendant:
Robert A. Baffert, Bob Baffert Racing, Inc. and Churchill Downs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Hills v. Hills et al
as 5:2020cv04014
Defendant:
Brent Hills, Carter Hills, William Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARISE et al v. VAN PELT et al
as 3:2017cv13434
Plaintiff:
MARJORIE PARISE and ROBERT PARISE
Defendant:
DANIEL M. VAN PELT, THOMAS GANNON, GORDON VON SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Adams et al v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv03778
Plaintiff:
William Adams , Laverne Arndt , Thomas Barber and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta Crop Protection, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Janice Jackson v. Branch Banking & Trust Company
as 16-1536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANICE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY (BB&T) REGISTERED AGENT, SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C. and others
Jackson v. Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) et al
as 8:2014cv03155
Plaintiff:
Janice Jackson
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T), Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) Registered Agent, Samuel Samuel I. White, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dole v. Adams et al
as 2:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
C. Minot Dole
Defendant:
Jacob Carroll and William Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dole v. Adams et al
as 1:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
C. Minot Dole
Defendant:
Jacob Carroll and William Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
