Cases 91 - 100 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
YAMRUS v. TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON et al
as 5:2008cv02842
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH YAMRUS
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON, DANIEL C. COTTURO, JR. and SCOTT E. MILLER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. TCIM Services, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00348
Plaintiff:
Malia E Miller
Defendant:
TCIM Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jenkins et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv01236
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jenkins, Christopher Jenkins, Othelle Rhue and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, John Ozmint, James Slaigh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eric Miller v. Fairfax Circuit Court
as 08-5070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric E. Miller
Defendant - Appellee:
Fairfax Circuit Court
MILLER v. FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT
as 1:2008cv00427
Plaintiff:
ERIC E. MILLER
Defendant:
FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv01227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Maki v. United States Of America et al
as 7:2007cv00443
Plaintiff:
William H. Maki, Sr., William H. Maki, Sr., William H. Maki, Sr. and others
Defendant:
United States Of America, William E. Miller, Unknown Psychiatric Officer of the Day and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
