Cases 91 - 100 of 234
Eric Watkins v. One Unknown U.S. Post Office, et al
as 17-14501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE UNKNOWN U.S. POST OFFICE EMPLOYEE, TWO UNKNOWN DEA AGENTS and IVAN J. RAMIREZ, One United States Postal Inspector
Stephens v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2017cv03933
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Stephens
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, United States Post Office of Tucker, Georgia, James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tracy Webb v. Post Office, et al
as 17-16998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
POST OFFICE and GFS PROPERTIES
Broske v. Kinney et al
as 2:2017cv01288
Plaintiff:
James Keith Broske
Defendant:
Kathleen Kinney, Social Security Administration, David Linedorf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. James et al
as 4:2017cv04334
Plaintiff:
Tracy Webb
Defendant:
Post Office and GFS Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashdown v. 12th District Court of Appeals et al
as 2:2017cv00661
Defendant:
12th District Court of Appeals, Haughey & Niehaus LLC, Butler County Courts and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon James Ashdown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarence Branch v. Attorney General, et al
as 17-5169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clarence Branch
Defendant - Appellee:
Attorney General, Central Intelligence Agency, Director, YMCA of America and others
Dillon v. Birmingham Post Office
as 2:2017cv01063
Plaintiff:
James Linnus Dillon
Defendant:
Birmingham Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2017cv04219
Plaintiff:
Yaisha F. Hodges
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Ohio Civil Rights Commission, Freddie Rufus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRANCH v. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2017cv00971
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE A BRANCH, III
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, YMCA OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
