Cases 91 - 100 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Pruitt, et al v. City of Clinton, et al
as 10-5946
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM PRUITT, dba Tow Right Wrecker Service and SHIRLEY PRUITT, dba Tow Right Wrecker Service
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF CLINTON, RICHARD SCARBOROUGH, Chief and STEVE JONES, individually and officially
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv61336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00263
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv02578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lake v. City of Phoenix et al
as 2:2009cv01301
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lake
Defendant:
City of Phoenix, Phoenix Police Department, Benjamin Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Central Delta Water Agency et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2009cv00861
Plaintiff:
Central Delta Water Agency and South Delta Water Agency
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, J. William McDonald, Mike Chotkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv01796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
