Cases 121 - 130 of 142
Rodriguez-Flores et al v. United States Government et al
as 3:2019cv01642
Defendant:
Rosa Emilia Rodriguez-Velez, Bureau of Prisons, MDC Guaynabo, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
ALICIA AYBAR-ROSADO and ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ-FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dannez Hunter v. Keith Rupert Murdoch, et al
as 19-2293
Defendant / Appellee:
David S. Doty, Ruben Castillo, James Rupert Murdoch and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dannez W. Hunter
RADAKER v. BARR et al
as 2:2019cv00712
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. BARR and REGINA LOMBARDO
Plaintiff:
KEITH RADAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FIFE et al v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv13912
Defendant:
JUDSON W. MURDOCK, II, MARK A MORGAN, WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN G. AND ELIZABETH STEELMAN FOUNDATION and H. FRANK FIFE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perlock v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv03792
Plaintiff:
Roger P. Perlock
Defendant:
Illinois State Police, William P. Barr and Thomas E. Brandon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TARTT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv01615
Defendant:
SHELDON NAGELBERG, MANAHAR AWATRIMANI, ELIJAH MESHIAH and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK B. TARTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MAKARA v. BARR et al
as 2:2019cv00593
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, WILLIAM P. BARR, THOMAS E. BRANDON and others
Plaintiff:
THEODORE A. MAKARA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
PRICE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019mc00068
Plaintiff:
JAMES PRICE
Defendant:
SARAH LILLY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UKNOWN NAMED DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EMPLOYEES and others
Cromar et al v. USA et al
as 2:2019cv00255
Defendant:
Joan Flach, Ryan S. Watson, Wanda I. Manley and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Kenneth Cromar and Barbara Ann Cromar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
