Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Pearl Johnson v. Dwight Luckett, et al
as 16-60466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEARL L. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT LUCKETT, in his capacity as superintendent of Canton Public School District, CASSANDRA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Assistant Superintendent of Canton Public School District, KESCHER RANKIN, in her official and individual capacities as Principal of Canton Elementary School and others
Johnson v. Luckett et al
as 3:2014cv00803
Plaintiff:
Pearl L. Johnson
Defendant:
Dwight Luckett, Cassandra Williams, Kescher Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Bently et al
as 2:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Robert Bently, Spencer Collin, A C Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY et al v. ARAMARK HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02678
Plaintiff:
CHAL D. KENNEDY, SR.
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC , WALTER FLAHERTY , VERONICA LEMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bently Barrett v. John Netherlain et al
as 8:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
Bently Barrett
Defendant:
Michelle Chartier, Does, Robert Munoz and others
Marty v. Green et al
as 2:2010cv01823
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Marty
Defendant:
Louis B. Green, Edward L. Knapp, Joan Barbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sarpong v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv04147
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sarpong
Defendant:
City of New York, Okelie Bently and John Doe # 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv04624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
