Cases 11 - 20 of 77,389
John v. Deml et al
as 2:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Discola John
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml and Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Discola v. Deml
as 2:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
John Discola
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Gregson v. City of San Marcos et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
John Gregson
Defendant:
City of San Marcos, Hays County, Officer John Reeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 d Federally Assisted Programs
Bliss v. Bedford City School District et al.
as 1:2024cv00686
Defendant:
Bedford City School District, Bedford City Board of Education, Bridgett Ewing and others
Plaintiff:
Lanese Bliss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dopkins v. Fridley Police Department et al
as 0:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Bradford Cain Dopkins
Defendant:
Fridley Police Department, Bridget McBride, Enis Vatres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
