Cases 11 - 20 of 81
ANDERSON v. MOULTRIE POLICE DEPT. et al
as 7:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
NICKLOUS TRAVIS ANDERSON
Defendant:
MOULTRIE POLICE DEPT and Officer WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Moultrie Police Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Nicklous Travis Anderson
Defendant:
Moultrie Police Dept. and Officer Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson, Jr v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 2:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Lowell Robinson, Jr.
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Leandro Guillen, Joya Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young-Moultrie v. Perez et al
as 1:2022cv02132
Plaintiff:
Malik Young-Moultrie
Defendant:
Police Officer G Perez, J Callender, Unidentified NYPD Sergeant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moultrie v. Thompson et al
as 4:2021cv12822
Plaintiff:
Shakeida Moultrie
Defendant:
Justin Thompson, Andrew McKinley, Edward Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. DILLARD et al
as 7:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GRAY
Defendant:
PETE DILLARD, Officer BRITTANY JOHNSON, Officer JERIAH RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. City of North Charleston Planning and Zoning Department
as 2:2021cv03334
Plaintiff:
Harold Simmons, Jr
Defendant:
City of North Charleston Planning and Zoning Department, R Keith Summey, Mary Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moultrie v. Thompson et al
as 4:2021cv11786
Plaintiff:
Shakeida Moultrie
Defendant:
Justin Thompson, Andrew McKinley, Edward Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moultrie et al v. The Bridge Luxury Apartment
as 3:2021cv00333
Plaintiff:
Aaron Moultrie and Jasmine Montalvo
Defendant:
The Bridge Luxury Apartment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
