Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 23-6166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY BROWN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Schiff v. Brown et al
as 8:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Graham Schiff
Defendant:
Anthony Brown, John McCarthy, Nicholas Picerno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Schiff v. Brown
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Graham Schiff
Defendant:
Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander Jiggetts v. State of Maryland
as 23-1080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER JIGGETTS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND and ATTORNEY GENERAL ANTHONY BROWN
Anthony-Brown v. Jefferson Dental Clinic, P.C et al
as 4:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Sheila Anthony-Brown
Defendant:
Jefferson Dental Clinic, P.C, Yuexi Chen, Klar C. Henry & Nesta Family Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jiggetts v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Alexander Jiggetts
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Attorney General Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Daniels, Jr. v. Nationwide General Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
Clarence Daniels, Jr.
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company, City of Charlotte, Charlotte Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dennis v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
Suzy Dennis
Defendant:
Anthony Brown, Geoffrey Vogel, Nathaniel Nedig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Lane County et al
as 6:2021cv01866
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Lane County, Alfredo Velez, Nathan Gent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
