Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Barlow v. State Atty General et al
as 3:2017cv00761
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. Barlow, III
Defendant:
State Atty General, Atty General, State Criminal Justice Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. Laffer et al
as 1:2017cv02944
Plaintiff:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant:
Arthur B. Laffer, FORD M SCUDDER, Mike R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clinton Barlow, III v. Arthur Laffer, et al
as 17-5485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTHUR LAFFER, CEO Laffer Associates, FORD M. SCUDDER, N.J. State Treasury, MIKE R. SMITH and others
Barlow v. Laffer et al
as 3:2017cv00655
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. Barlow, III
Defendant:
Arthur B. Laffer, Ford M. Scudder, Mike R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barlow v. Washington State AOC Court Director et al
as 3:2017cv05228
Plaintiff:
Clinton C Barlow, III
Defendant:
Washington State AOC Court Director, Mary McQueen, Jay Inslee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. Laffer et al
as 1:2017cv01939
Plaintiff:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant:
Arthur Laffer, FORD M SCUDDER, Mike R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. Laffer et al
as 3:2017cv01939
Plaintiff:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant:
Arthur Laffer, FORD M SCUDDER, Mike R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barlow v. Sessions et al
as 2:2017cv00429
Plaintiff:
Clinton C Barlow, III
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions, Rodney Thompson, Thomas M Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. Laffer et al
as 2:2017cv02208
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. Barlow, III
Defendant:
Arthur Laffer, Ford M. Scudder, Mike R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. Cruz et al
as 3:2017cv00743
Plaintiff:
Clinton C Barlow, III
Defendant:
Ted Cruz, United States of America, GW Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
