Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv05685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Simmons v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00438
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Simmons
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections , Yaritza Colon, Robert A. Delp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Delp v. Salem District Court et al
as 1:2010cv10622
Plaintiff:
Scott W. Delp, Jr.
Defendant:
Salem District Court, Robert A. Cornetta and Ann M. Cocci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delp v. State Police Department et al
as 1:2009cv11593
Plaintiff:
Scott W. Delp, Jr.
Defendant:
State Police Department and George Katsarakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delp v. County of Sacramento
as 2:2009cv00605
Plaintiff:
Nanette Delp
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, John McGinness, Paula Wood and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Martin, et al v. Ohio Governor, et al
as 2:1989cv00362
Plaintiff:
Nancy Martin , Kathy R , Claude Martin and others
Defendant:
Robert A Taft, II , Kenneth W Ritchey , Thomas J Hayes and others
Movant:
Ohio Health Care Association , John F Kirwan, Jr , Debra Lynn Moffett and others
Amicu:
Ohio Private Residential Association and Dennis J. Kucinich
Intervenor_defendant:
Heinzerling Foundation
Intervenor_plaintiff:
JOEL MARTIN , The Voice of the Retarded and The Ohio League for the Mentally Retarded
Objector:
Donna Amato et al , Paul Virgil Patterson and Anthony J. Coco
Material_witne:
Chester, Willcox & Saxbe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
