Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0701
Asanachescu et al v. Clark County et al
as 3:2013cv05222
Plaintiff:
Afrodita Asanachescu and Cristian C. Asanachescu
Defendant:
Clark County, Conmed, Inc. , Gary E Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sylvia E. Nofsinger v. VCU
as 12-1961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVIA E. NOFSINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY, E. DOUGLAS BOUDINOT, Dean, School of Graduate Studies, CECIL B. DRAIN, Dean, School of Allied Health Professions and others
Defendant:
LISA D. SHOAF, Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy and EMMA WHEELER, Assistant Professor, Chair of Admissions
Nofsinger v. Virginia Commonwealth University et al
as 3:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Sylvia E. Nofsinger
Defendant:
Virginia Commonwealth University , E. Douglas Boudinot , Cecil B. Drain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nofsinger v. Virginia Commonwealth University et al
as 7:2012cv00030
Defendant:
E. Douglas Boudinot, Cecil B. Drain, Thomas P. Mayhew and others
Plaintiff:
Sylvia E. Nofsinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Nofsinger v. Rao et al
as 3:2011cv00499
Plaintiff:
Sylvia E. Nofsinger
Defendant:
Michael Rao, E. Douglas Boudinot, Cecil B. Drain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2010cv00470
Plaintiff:
Edwin Arnell Chandler
Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville, Jefferson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
