Cases 11 - 20 of 140
Sat v. Schmite et al
as 3:2023cv01546
Plaintiff:
Khalid Caldwell Sat
Defendant:
Mike Schmite, Nikolas Matiatos and Marisa Fonseca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Fifer et al v. Limon Properties, et al
as 7:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Robert Fifer and Teresa Fifer
Defendant:
Limon Properties - Fonseca Rentals, Limon Properties, Fonseca Rentals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv24236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Boyd v. Fonseca
as 4:2022cv04145
Plaintiff:
Jeff Alan boyd and Jeff Boyd
Defendant:
Jorge Fonseca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fonseca v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2022cv01416
Plaintiff:
April Fonseca and April Ehrlich
Defendant:
City of Medford, Jackson County, James Barringer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee et al v. City of Midland et al
as 7:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Jared Lee, Dana Ellis, Matthew Counts and others
Defendant:
City of Midland, Jennie Alonzo, Rosemary Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fonseca-Salgado v. Gonzalez
as 3:2022cv01371
Plaintiff:
YAMIL FONSECA SALGADO and Yamil Fonseca-Salgado
Defendant:
Maria del Mar Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
