Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Robles, et al v. RMS Management Solutions, et al
as 14-3028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIEL M. ROBLES and BONNIE ROBLES
Defendant - Appellee:
RMS MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC and FNU BERRY, Shawnee County Court Judge, Third Judicial District, Small Claims/Limited Actions
Robles et al v. RMS Management Solutions LLC et al
as 5:2013cv04100
Plaintiff:
Gabriel M. Robles and Bonnie Robles
Defendant:
RMS Management Solutions LLC and (fnu) Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel Coker v. Arkansas State Police, et al
as 12-3601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gabriel M. Coker
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas State Police and Brad Cartwright, in his individual capacity and official capacity as a State Trooper for the Arkansas State Police
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
S. R. et al v. Reese et al
as 1:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
S. R. and Heralda Serrano
Defendant:
John Reese and Espanola School Board of Education
Miscellaneou:
Gabrielle M Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coker v. Arkansas State Police et al
as 4:2011cv00867
Plaintiff:
Gabriel M Coker
Defendant:
Arkansas State Police and Brad Cartwright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoewischer v. Murdock et al
as 3:2011cv00230
Plaintiff:
Norman Hoewischer
Defendant:
Stewart E. Murdock, Sally B. Murdock, Mark N. Shainbrown and others
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
