Cases 11 - 20 of 165
M&T BANK v. CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS et al
as 3:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. The Vanguard Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Raymond Peterson, Jr.
Defendant:
The Vanguard Group, Inc., State of Florida, Piswy Fl. Cal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
as 22-2942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Rimini
Defendant / Appellee:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Securities, LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
as 22-2941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Rimini
Defendant / Appellee:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Securities, LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
as 22-2605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Rimini
Defendant / Appellee:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Gender)
Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2022cv07768
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rimini
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Securities, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nunez v. Adams et al
as 1:2022cv04211
Plaintiff:
Humberto Antonio Nunez
Defendant:
Eric Adams, Eric Gonzalez, Ismael Zayas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jemison v. IL Dept of Health
as 22-20114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
George Jemison
Defendant / Appellee:
Illinois Department of Health and Family Services, Illinois Secretary of State, Comptroller State of Illinois and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
