Cases 11 - 20 of 100
DIRCKS et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Defendant:
RICHARD PAYNE, JEFFREY KELLER, BENNII WELDY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN DIRCKS and BARRY DIRCKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. BRODERICK et al
as 1:2020cv02828
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON, CITY OF ANDERSON and TOM BRODERICK
Plaintiff:
ANIKKA KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Sanders v. Indiana Department of Child Services et al
as 3:2020cv00674
Defendant:
Mery Beth Bonaventura, Indiana Department of Child Services Workers, Suntana L Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Iredell Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2020cv01825
Defendant:
KEVIN C. SMITH, SUZANNAH WILSON OVERHOLT, PAUL RAUSCH and others
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. MAYOR et al
as 1:2020cv01804
Defendant:
MAYOR, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JON B KING, CHIEF, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
TED BELCHER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00890
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
YANANTA v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv03928
Plaintiff:
ISI CHITO LUSA YANANTA, WASTEUH MEHERRIN NATION and HAKEEM SHABAZZ
Defendant:
CHARLES KING, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEYLEN v. COMMONS et al
as 1:2019cv03235
Defendant:
DANA CHILDRESS-JONES, RALPH STAPLES, STEPHEN GREY and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR KEEYLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
