Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Ardell v. Thomas
as 2:2010cv01042
Plaintiff:
Korry L Ardell
Defendant:
Nicole Marie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Acey v. Mary Thomas, et al
as 10-5899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. ACEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY THOMAS, alleged to be the foreperson of the grand jury that indicted Plaintiff, W. H. SWEET, alleged to be the foreperson of the grand jury that indicted Plaintiff and WILLIAM L. GIBBONS, the District Attorney General for the Thirtieth Judicial District at Memphis
McBride v. Thomas et al
as 4:2010cv02603
Plaintiff:
Daryn Thomas McBride
Defendant:
Ricky Thomas , Mary Thomas , Michelle Thomas and others
Counter_claimant:
Ricky Thomas , Mary Thomas and Michelle Thomas
Counter_defendant:
Daryn Thomas McBride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Thomas et al
as 2:2010cv02476
Plaintiff:
Derek Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Thomas and William L. Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Thomas et al
as 2:2010cv02471
Plaintiff:
Carlee L. Williams
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, W.H. Sweet and William L. Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dancy v. Thomas et al
as 2:2010cv02470
Plaintiff:
Louis D. Dancy
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, W.H. Sweet and William L. Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acey v. Thomas et al
as 2:2010cv02428
Plaintiff:
William L. Acey
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, W.H. Sweet and William L. Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. Thomas et al
as 2:2010cv02427
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Atkins
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, W.H. Sweet and William L. Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. United States
as 2:2010cv00073
Plaintiff:
Denise Marie Thomas
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
