Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Stephens v. Brunsden et al
as 1:2017cv01153
Defendant:
Lesley A. Brovner, Andrew C. Brunsden, Michael Carroll and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Zickes v. Cuyahoga County, et al
as 16-4180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ZICKES
Defendant - Appellee:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, CUYAHOGA COUNTY EXECUTIVE, BRYAN SMITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Zickes v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2015cv01865
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County , Cuyahoga County Executive , Bryan Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zickes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00520
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Newman v. Village of Camden et al
as 6:2014cv00749
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Newman
Not Classified By Court:
Gustave J. DiBianco and Kenneth Alweis
Defendant:
Village of Camden, Richard D. Paul, Sr., Michael Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scheffler v. Lee et al
as 3:2014cv00373
Plaintiff:
Troy K. Scheffler
Defendant:
Alex Lee, Michael Carroll, Frederick Asset Protection LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skinner v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06505
Defendant:
Michael Carroll, City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10,
Plaintiff:
Peter Skinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawtis Donald Rhoden v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2013cv01323
Defendant:
Michael Carrol, County of Orange, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Lawtis Donald Rhoden
Aziz v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv01934
Plaintiff:
Safwan Aziz
Defendant:
NYC Police Officer Michael Carroll and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
