Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
GREENE v. GRAAF et al
as 2:2019cv04734
Defendant:
KENNETH HOLDSMAN, JONATHAN VAN DUSEN, VERIZON NETWORK and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREENE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-2042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GREENE v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv05444
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREENE
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN THOMAS, MARVIN GRAAF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENE v. SLOANE et al
as 2:2017cv03497
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREENE
Defendant:
TIM SLOANE, TD BANK CORPORATE, MARKET STREET VILLAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks, III et al v. Harris County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2017cv02198
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Brooks, III , Geraldine Brooks , Na'Tosha Robinson and others
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Department , Unknown Deputies as Agents and Sheriff Ron Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Wells Fargo et al
as 1:2017cv00808
Plaintiff:
John Greene
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, TD Bank, Market Street Village and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morrison v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv04216
Defendant:
PO Michael Brooks, Lt Daniel Divers, New York City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Kaleem Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
