Cases 11 - 20 of 1,119
Stuart v. Glass
as 8:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Steven Stuart
Defendant:
Mark Glass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024xc00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Stuart Robinson v. Clise Properties Inc
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
Clise Properties Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stuart Robinson v. City of Seattle
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Human Services Campus Incorporated
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
Human Services Campus Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Stuart Robinson v. State of Washington
as 3:2024cv05129
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz Restaurant, Inc. et al v. The Village of Ossining et al
as 7:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
Diaz Restaurant, Inc. doing business as Atlantic Bar, Carlos Diaz, Sirenita Lounge Inc and others
Defendant:
The Village of Ossining, Village of Ossining Police Department, Chief of Police Kevin Sylvester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Stuart v. Sackett et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Brook Stuart and Brooke Stuart
Defendant:
Joseph Sackett, Amanda Winters and Austen Philips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wall v. Greene et al
as 1:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Wall
Defendant:
Stuart Greene, Kathleen Wall, Barron S. Wall, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
