Cases 11 - 20 of 159
THE IMPERIAL SOVEREIGN COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA et al v. Knudsen et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
THE IMPERIAL SOVEREIGN COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, ADRIA JAWORT, RACHEL CORCORAN and others
Defendant:
Austin Knudsen, Elsie Arntzen, J.P. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe 1, et al v. William Thornbury, Jr., et al
as 23-5609
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN MINOR DOE 1, by and through his next friend, Jane Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. THORNBURY, JR., MD, in his official capacity as the President of the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, et al.
Intervenor:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL DANIEL CAMERON
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALASKA and others
L. W., et al v. Jonathan Skrmetti, et al
as 23-5600
Plaintiff / Appellee:
L. W., by and through her parents and next friends, Samantha Williams and Brian Williams, SAMANTHA WILLIAMS, BRIAN WILLIAMS and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN THOMAS SKRMETTI, in his official capacity as the Tennessee Attorney General and Reporter, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RALPH ALVARADO, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Health and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Doe 1 et al v. Thornbury et al
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Minor Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
William C. Thornbury, Jr., Audria Denker and Eric Friedlander
Intervenor Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky ex rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Pediatric Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rhame v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
Liza Rhame
Defendant:
State of Colorado, SE CDOC Parole-Op, El Paso County, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooke Henderson, et al v. Springfield R-12 School District, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brooke Henderson and Jennifer Lumley
Defendant / Appellee:
Springfield R-12 School District, Board of Education, of the Springfield R-12 School District, Grenita Lathan and others
Defendant:
Martha Doenning
Appellant:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Alliance Defending Freedom, Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and others
K.C. v. THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al
as 1:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
K. C., NATHANIEL CLAWSON, BETH CLAWSON and others
Defendant:
THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AGENCY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, State of Alabama, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Interested Party:
GENDERNEXUS, INC. and GENDER EXPANSIVE KIDS & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moms for Liberty - Brevard County, FL, et al v. Brevard Public Schools, et al
as 23-10656
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOMS FOR LIBERTY - BREVARD COUNTY, FL, AMY KNEESSY, ASHLEY HALL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BREVARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS, MISTY HAGGARD-BELFORD, MATT SUSIN and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF ALASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, ADVANCING AMERICAN FREEDOM, INC., AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10616
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jackson v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Carmela Lynn Jackson
Defendant:
State of Indiana, State of Montana, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
