Cases 11 - 20 of 1,428
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Davis (PS) et al v. Poellot et al
as 1:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Latonya Denise Davis, Curtis Meeks, Jr., Anita Jean Dilworth and others
Defendant:
Sarah Poellot, Sherry, Schimmels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Victora Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt et al v. Clive Davis et al
as 2:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Clive Davis, Saviii 3rd, The Diamonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blair v. Stone County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Harleen Blair
Defendant:
Stone County, Mississippi, Mike Farmer, Philip L. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TANDE v. STONE
as 2:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
FILBERT TANDE
Defendant:
TRACY STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TANDE v. STONE
as 2:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
FILBERT TANDE
Defendant:
TRACY STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TANDE v. STONE
as 2:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
FILBERT TANDE
Defendant:
TRACY STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Vanbuskirk v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6070
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
