Cases 11 - 20 of 1,891
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
STROUD v. PARRELL et al
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY STROUD
Defendant:
STEPHEN PARRELL, JOHN DOES, CAPTAIN TRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vaughn v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Vaughn
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Jonathan Douglass, Barry Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Peet et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Peet, Sr. and Audrea Rachelle Peet
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Greg Turnbow, Jonathan Douglass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
