Cases 191 - 200 of 2,396
Moshir v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2017cv01460
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Government, NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Hunter v. Corrections Corporation of Am., et al
as 17-13013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, WARDEN, RON DAY, Chaplain and others
Rodriguez v. California, State of et al
as 2:2017cv02084
Defendant:
La Palma Correctional Center, Chuck Keeton, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Juarez Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Head of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit et al
as 1:2017cv00303
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Head of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Thomas Doe, Canby Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2017cv01317
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Sgt. Sullivan, Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC f/k/a Corrections Corporation of America
as 3:2017cv00958
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Higgins et al
as 1:2017cv00284
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Marina Higgins, K. Tom, Jacob Feagai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. Captain Conley et al
as 1:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Captain Conley, United States Marshal, Warden Larose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00631
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NELSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01186
Plaintiff:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY SHORTSTEIN, NAT GLOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
