Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Mead v. Gaston County Police Department et al
as 0:2011cv03017
Plaintiff:
Michael Mead
Defendant:
Gaston County Police Department, North Carolina State Bureau of Investigations, William J Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Ace Bonding Company et al
as 3:2011cv00697
Plaintiff:
William Chadwick Brooks
Defendant:
Ace Bonding Company, Anthony Viggins, Josh Bandit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Brown et al
as 2:2011cv00470
Plaintiff:
Cornell Lorenzo Sanders
Defendant:
James Gregory Brown , Bruce Phillip Busbee , Richard Czuprynski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ronald Madden v. City of Chattanooga, et al
as 11-5023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. MADDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, Governamental Agencis of the City of Chattanooga Mayor's Office at City Hall, sued in their individual and official capacities, WILLIAM H. COX, Officer of the Attorney General's Office, sued in their individual and official capacities, REBECCA STERN, Criminal Court Judge, sued in her individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
CHATTANOOGA BONDING COMPANY, INCORPORATED and W.B. COLLINS
Hamilton v. Nixon
as 4:2010cv01908
Plaintiff:
Maisha Imani Hamilton
Defendant:
Jeremiah "Jay" Nixon, Robin Carnahan, Mo Governor's Extradition Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Office of Illinois Attorney General et al
as 1:2010cv06449
Plaintiff:
Maisha Imani Hamilton
Defendant:
Office of Illinois Attorney General, Lisa Madigan, Fotopolous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCallup v. Goss Bonding Company et al
as 4:2010cv01609
Plaintiff:
Veronica McCallup
Defendant:
Goss Bonding Company, Christopher Harsett, Easy Bonding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timson v. Coates et al
as 8:2009cv02055
Plaintiff:
John W. Timson
Defendant:
James Coates, Robert Ditmeyers, Ken Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
