Cases 21 - 30 of 580
WARREN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02047
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, GREG HOLCUMB, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derek Thomas v. John Bartholomew, IV, et al
as 23-13683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEREK THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, IV, DANIEL CHARLES DAVIS, HARLAND GRIFFITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sternberg v. Warneck et al
as 2:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Michael C Sternberg
Defendant:
Shelley Warneck, Jeff Rosen, Steve Wolfson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Griffith v. New York State Attorney General
as 5:2023cv01266
Plaintiff:
Howard Griffith
Defendant:
New York State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv20513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03222
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Avila v. ACACIA Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07834
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avila
Defendant:
ACACIA Network, Inc. and Trevor Griffiths
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
