Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Lott v. Marietta Municipal Court et al
as 2:2013cv00377
Plaintiff:
Harry William Lott
Defendant:
Marietta Municipal Court and The Appeals 4th Appellate District 205
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
William v. Marietta Municipal Court
as 2:2012cv01089
Plaintiff:
Harry William
Defendant:
Marietta Municipal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Albert Connolly v. James Williams, et al
as 12-14249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT J. CONNOLLY
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY P. HEALD, Esq.
Defendant:
JAMES HARRY WILLIAMS, JOSEPH CASSATA, individually and in his capacity as a City Court Judge for the City of Tonawanda, New York, MARK SALTARELLI, individually and in his capacity as a City Court Associate Judge for the City of Tonawanda, New York and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connolly v. Williams et al
as 1:2011cv04298
Plaintiff:
Albert J. Connolly
Defendant:
James Harry Williams, Joseph Cassata , Mark Saltarelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01858
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Finch v. Horn et al
as 2:2007cv01163
Plaintiff:
Charlton Finch
Defendant:
Michael Horn, Trevor Meade, Harry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
