Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YisraEl v. J. P. Morgan Chase Bank
as 10-3320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tekiyah M. YisraEl
Defendant - Appellee:
J. P. Morgan Chase Bank, care of Simmons, Jannace & Stagg, LLP, Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General, Panamanian Consul. for the President of Panama - Torrijo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv12251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Asiasante v. J P Morgan Chase
as 5:2010cv00045
Plaintiff:
Dsafir J Asiasante
Defendant:
J P Morgan Chase
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Madden v. J P Morgan Chase & Co.
as 3:2009cv01975
Plaintiff:
Bette Madden
Defendant:
J P Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Nale v. J P Morgan Chase Bank N A et al
as 5:2009cv01503
Plaintiff:
Joan Nale
Defendant:
J P Morgan Chase Bank N A, J P Morgan Chase Bank N A, Tomika Tolliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dean v. The United States et al
as 1:2009mi00277
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Dean
Defendant:
The United States, The State of Georgia, Douglas County, Georgia and others
Movant:
C T Corporation System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to interfere with civil rights
Type:
Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
