Cases 21 - 30 of 34
HERNANDEZ v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY et al
as 1:2013cv01655
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY, J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Janet Mazur, et al
as 13-2303
Plaintiff - Appellee:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
JANET A. MAZUR and MICHAEL R. MAZUR
Archer v. Lazarus et al
as 0:2013cv61808
Plaintiff:
Peter N. Archer
Defendant:
Joel T. Lazarus, Ronald R. Wolfe and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Title III Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv50386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Wheat v. Chase Bank, JP Morgan et al
as 3:2011cv00309
Plaintiff:
Wayne L Wheat
Defendant:
Chase Bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Matthew Cox and Unknown Officers and Employees of Chase Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McMillan v. Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv02048
Plaintiff:
Denise McMillan
Defendant:
Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC, Howard N. Bierman, Jacob Geesing and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Warren v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01251
Plaintiff:
Harold Warren, Jr,MD
Defendant:
City of New York, Marisol Centeno, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
