Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Rizzuti v. Lappin et al
as 6:2012cv03196
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Marty C. Anderson, Juan D. Castillo and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rizzuti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAMLIN v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00082
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R HAMLIN
Defendant:
USA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, NOEL C MARCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Rizzuti v. Lappin et al
as 6:2011cv03405
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rizzuti
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, Thomas R Kane, Marty C Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Bryant v. United States Bureau of Prison, et al
as 11-56371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons, ROBERT E. MCFADDEN, in his official capacity as Regional Director of the United States Bureau of Prions Western Region and others
Belcher v. Vargas et al
as 2:2011cv02070
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Belcher
Defendant:
Vargas, Harley Lappin and Juan D. Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belcher v. Vargas et al
as 2:2011cv02069
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Belcher
Defendant:
Vargas, Juan D. Castillio and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COLTRANE v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2011cv00117
Plaintiff:
MARY L. COLTRANE
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, GERARDO MALDONADO, JR., JOE KEFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Bryant v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
David Bryant
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Robert E. MCFadden, Francisco J. Quintana and others
Parker v. Hickey et al
as 5:2010cv00392
Plaintiff:
Troy Parker
Defendant:
Deborah A. Hickey, Rob Nagel, C. Eichenlaub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01871
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
